Few months ago my supervisor asked me to produce any paper and submit it to any conference. Just for getting any comments from the others. It is my first experience on writing paper. I dont have any knowledge before How to write a paper well. The structure, the composition, and etc. something like that . That’s why i produce my first paper perfuntoryly. then i submit to ICIAS (International Conference on Intelligent and Advanced System) held by UTP and IEEE.
You know, what is the result? as i predict before, my paper is strongly rejected. Hiks… What ’s silly of me. it is truely embarrased me. but anyway i got many feedback and comment from the reviewers. these all: i do hope i will can do better… Next.
Dear Mr. Ahmad Mukhlason:
We regret to inform you that your paper #1569060237 ('Toward Adaptive and
intelligent Moodle E-learning System') cannot be accepted for presentation and
publication in the Proceedings of ICIAS2007 .
======= Review 1 =======
> *** Relevance and Timeliness: Please rate the relevance of the paper to the
conference, and the importance of the topic addressed in the paper and its
timeliness within its area of research.
Average (3)
> *** Novelty and Originality: Please rate the novelty and originality of the work
presented in the paper
Average (3)
> *** Technical Content and Correctness: Please rate the technical contents of the
paper, its soundness and scientific rigour
Below Average (2)
> *** Quality of Presentation: Please rate the quality of presentation including
(i)paper organization, (ii)clearness of text and figures,(iii)completeness and
accuracy of references, and (iv)correct usage of english
Average (3)
> *** Overall Recommendation: Please indicate your overall recommendation
Marginal (3)
> *** Comments to Authors: Please highlight to the authors the strengths and
weaknesses of their paper and justify your assessment. Please indicate any changes
that should be made to the paper if it is accepted.
This paper is still in proposal stage. Authors have to state the problem statement
and identify why moodle is chosen. The methodology and expected finding should be
refine. The abstract overall is not clear.
======= Review 2 =======
> *** Relevance and Timeliness: Please rate the relevance of the paper to the
conference, and the importance of the topic addressed in the paper and its
timeliness within its area of research.
Average (3)
> *** Novelty and Originality: Please rate the novelty and originality of the work
presented in the paper
Average (3)
> *** Technical Content and Correctness: Please rate the technical contents of the
paper, its soundness and scientific rigour
Below Average (2)
> *** Quality of Presentation: Please rate the quality of presentation including
(i)paper organization, (ii)clearness of text and figures,(iii)completeness and
accuracy of references, and (iv)correct usage of english
Below Average (2)
> *** Overall Recommendation: Please indicate your overall recommendation
Reject (2)
> *** Comments to Authors: Please highlight to the authors the strengths and
weaknesses of their paper and justify your assessment. Please indicate any changes
that should be made to the paper if it is accepted.
no data given. only expected finding
Regards,
Prof. Ir Dr Ahmad Fadzil Mohd Hani, TPC Chair
|
|
|
|
|
This entry was posted on Friday, August 17th, 2007 at 4:26 pm and is filed under Diary. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
August 21, 2007 at 5:48 am
tetap semangat chak son! no pain no gain…
October 23, 2009 at 11:41 am
Could I please get a copy of this paper?
Cheers
Markus